Thunker’s Weblog


Grace

Robert Wheadon-126x150

I’ve been reading the last few weeks on the topic of grace.  It’s a topic over-discussed, or it’s a topic where only fools dare to tread.  It’s no surprise, then, why I’m jumping right in.

The time-worn debate centers around whether faith or works grants us access to God’s grace.  Let me settle that debate right away and declare the correct answer is “Yes.” All better now?  Me, neither.  Let’s explore a little more and define some things.  I am defining grace as God’s ultimate gift to us, His children.  This gift comes in two parts.  One part is the gift of resurrection.  It is a gift given to all humanity.  All of Heavenly Father’s children will be resurrected through His Son, Jesus Christ.  The second part of the gift is exaltation.  Exaltation is the gift of living the life God lives.  It is being saved in God’s kingdom where He reigns.  Both parts of grace are granted to all of us through Jesus Christ’s atonement.  I sometimes get the impression that in our current world, Jesus Christ has become merely a spiritual friend, a cosmic counselor, or someone we mention in prayer because we were taught to.  Yet Jesus Christ is so much more than that.  He is the Only Begotten of our Father.  He voluntarily provided the way and means for us to return to God.  He has done everything for us.  He has provided the only path for us to overcome mortality and not be chained forever to the grave through the resurrection.  He has also paid the penalty we incur when we sin and distance ourselves from heaven.  In Ephesians 2: 5, 7-8, Paul wrote:

“5 Even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, (by grace ye are saved;)

7 That in the ages to come he might shew the exceeding riches of his grace in his kindness toward us through Christ Jesus.

8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God.”

Because of verses like this, some systems of theology have understood half of what is involved with grace.  And the half is true.  Grace is free, granted by a loving Father through His Son.  But what about works?  Aren’t we supposed to keep the commandments and earn our way into heaven?  That sounds good, except it’s impossible.  It takes a simple, honest question to see how incompatible that idea is with truth.  Can we atone for ourselves?  Can we pay the price justice demands when God’s command is broken?  Can we call down mercy from heaven for ourselves?  If we were totally honest, we would know that is not in our skill set.  The grace offered by Jesus Christ is essential.  What about repentance, though?  Isn’t that how I earn heavenly gold stars and walk back into heaven?  Don’t worry.  That’s coming up.  Now it’s time to address the works part of this theology.  Just to make sure the confusion on this issue is clear, let’s look at what Paul and James write about grace, faith and works.

In Galatians 2:16, Paul writes:

“16 Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.”

In James 2:14, 17-18, 20-22, 24 we read:

“14 What doth it profit, my brethren, though a man say he hath faith, and have not works? can faith save him?

17 Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone.

 

Feel free to comment, ask questions, or tell me I’m completely off base.

Be kind, make good memories, and come back soon.



Law of Consecration – Book Review
June 14, 2017, 11:52 pm
Filed under: Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, LDS, Mormon, religion

Robert Wheadon-126x150

The Mormon Theology Seminar has published another volume of scholarly papers. This volume, edited by Jeremiah John and Joseph M. Spencer, is entitled, “Embracing the Law – Reading Doctrine and Covenants 42.”  In Mormon theology, the Doctrine and Covenants is a volume of canonized scripture primarily containing revelations received by the prophet, Joseph Smith.  Each revelation is numerically designated as a “section.”

Section 42 is generally defined as the revelation where the Lord instructs the Prophet Joseph in the manner the poor of the church are to be cared for.  The revelation was called, “The Law,” by early church members, a contraction of the Law of Consecration.

Consecration, or the act of setting something or someone apart as holy, is the focal point of this revelation.  In a very general overview, the Lord’s plan was to have the early members of the church act as stewards over the properties they owned.  The stewards would retain what they needed for their needs and consecrate the extra to the church.  The church would then have the means to sustain the poor and needy.

The papers submitted by various LDS scholars on the topic of Doctrine and Covenants Section 42 cover various perspectives and interpretations of this revelation.  This collection offers a rich source for thought and additional questions of this 1831 revelation.  Let’s begin.

The first article is by LDS law professor, Nathan B. Oman.  Entitled, “‘I Will Give unto You My Law”: Section 42 as a Legal Text and the Paradoxes of Divine Law,” this article addresses the dichotomy of secular versus ecclesiastical law.  The question is a basic one in organized society and has been in scholarly circles since the 1600’s.  It is a question that continues to impact people on a global scale, with varying interpretations.  For example, in the United States, the UK and Europe, the division of secular law and theological law has been well established.  The division is not so established in Muslim countries where the Koran can form the basis of law.

For followers of any faith, the question arises as to what is more circumspect: to obey the law of your faith or to obey the law of the land.

Professor Oman presents the case that Section 42 is a document that contains both divine law, as well as a legal text.  The issue at hand is how the revelation instructs Joseph Smith to care for the poor of the church and to do so in a way that is legally in accordance with secular law.

As I mentioned above, the Law of Consecration involved caring for the poor by donating the excess of goods produced to the church for distribution among the poor.  One of the requirements set out in the revelation is that members would deed their property to the church, while still maintaining control of the property.  The question arose as to what happened to legal ownership of the property if the property’s historical owner decided to leave the church or was excommunicated from the church.  Did the departing member get the deed to his property back?  Section 42 declares that the property is retained by the church for the care of the poor.  It is no surprise that when Joseph Smith implemented the Law of Consecration, lawsuits arose from this very issue.

Professor Oman arrives at the conclusion that divine law is not a very comfortable bedfellow with secular law.  The two legal sources are not very compatible, mainly due to humanity’s lack of willingness to part with their worldly goods for the improvement of all.

Next is a paper by Jeremiah John entitled, “That My Covenant People May Be Gathered in One.”  Professor John is an associate professor of politics at Southern Virginia University.  The focus of Professor John’s paper is divine law and the reason for its success or failure in implementation among humanity.  His point is that divine law succeeds or fails solely on humanity’s obedience or apostasy of the law.  Law in theology gets defined as commandments and we then choose our level of compliance or disobedience.  The law itself is divine.  That divinity become effective only to the extent in which obedience is applied.  If the commandment or law is misinterpreted, disobeyed or ignored, then the blessings and celestial promises tied to that law cannot be bestowed.

There are several additional papers that explore some rather interesting topics such as teaching by the spirit, section 42 as a social justice document and the concepts of sacrifice versus consecration.  Joseph M. Spencer’s paper rounds out the volume with an outstanding article on textual variation in Section 42 and the Doctrine and Covenants in general.

All of the papers in this volume are thought-provoking and worth consideration.  Each article is unique in its perspective and well-researched.  I found it setting the bar for Mormon studies and Mormon theological examination at a lofty level.  It is a volume well done.



Humanity and Evil

Robert Wheadon-126x150

One of the questions that has bothered, bedeviled and out-right bugged theologians for the ages is the question of good and evil.  Specifically, the set-up is like this: “If God is the Creator, did He create evil?  If God is good, how could he allow evil to exist?  If he allows evil to exist, how can He be good?”  There are a host of assumptions going on there.  Yet point I really want to focus on today is the source of evil.  Do evil acts emanate from within us as mortals or are they forced upon us by exterior forces?

Sound familiar?  It should.  Christianity has been wrestling with these ideas for over 1000 years.  Early Christian writers, like St. Augustine, wrote voluminously on these topics.

Let’s begin with God and Creation.  In Genesis, 1:1, we read of God, or Elohim, creating the heavens and the earth.  In Hebrew, bara is the word translated as create.  The word also can be translated as to form, shape or mold.  Many Christians have been taught the tradition that divine creation means creatio ex nihilo, or creation from nothing.  While that sounds mysterious and ethereal, that description of creation has never made much sense to me.  And there is no scriptural evidence for it.  And natural law doesn’t work that way.   I have always thought that God, whether He created the laws of nature or follows the laws of nature, formed the Earth from existent material, more of an in ordine creaturae, creation through organization, than a creation out of nothing.  The approach of God shaping and molding physical matter into worlds, stars and moons makes more sense to my soul.

Flowing from the idea that God operates within existing natural laws and existing material, could the question of the creation of evil be the wrong question?  What I mean is that instead of taking the assumptive stance that God created evil, what if we took the idea that evil has always existed and is made manifest through the choices we make.  Like Jeremiah said in Jeremiah 11:8, we read, “Yet they obeyed not, nor inclined their ear, but walked every one in the imagination of their evil heart…”

I am not saying that humanity is inherently evil.  I don’t think that is what Jeremiah is saying either.  I think we have the divine ability to choose back and forth, one or the other.   Jeremiah is talking about the people of Judah at a time when they thought more of themselves than they did of God.  Jeremiah does validate the idea that people could decide and walk the path they wanted.

IMG_0682

So that takes us to the next part of our discussion.  Does evil exist as an independent force?  Or is it a construct of universal values and the conformity or non-conformity that determines good and evil?  A universal value would be humanity’s abhorrence of taking human life.  Or stealing.  Or lying. Or… well, you get my drift.  As mortals on this earth, whatever our culture, society or belief, these values appear to be rather universal.  When we deviate from these values, we cross the line from good to bad, light to dark, divine to evil.  Can we be influenced one way or the other?  In other words, can Satan and his minions make us be evil?  I don’t believe we can be forced to do anything.  However, I do believe if a choice is placed before us, there are powers of light and powers of darkness urging us to follow their disparate and opposite paths.  It’s our choice.  It’s always our choice.

 

So, be kind, make good memories and come back soon.



Did You See That?
May 5, 2017, 9:32 pm
Filed under: Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, LDS, Mormon, religion

Robert Wheadon-126x150

Do you remember the old Roadrunner and Wile E. Coyote cartoons?  Violence was rampant but the coyote never died.  (Thank goodness.)  Acme products abounded as Wile E. tried all sorts of devices and traps to capture his desired dinner.  He never did capture the Roadrunner, but I admired his tenacity.

One of the interesting things about that cartoon was the landscape in which the action occurred.  Set in what appears to be the American Southwest, the artistic technique of Perspective was constantly in use.  Perspective.  You know, the ability to express distance and space on a flat surface?  It’s how the Roadrunner cartoons could show huge heights and cliff drops, all of which Wile E. Coyote survived.

Perspective is the word we use to also describe our viewpoint in space and time.  This definition is especially useful in scripture study, as well.  In the scriptures we have the habit of taking a narrative and taking a broad brush to it, attaching values that may or may not be appropriate to the scripture narrative.

Let me give you an example.  Pete Enns, a bible scholar, related a story of an interaction many years ago with his then six-year-old daughter.  Dr. Enns was reading his daughter the story of the Exodus, of Israel leaving Egypt.  When he arrived at the part of the story where Moses parts the Red Sea, the Israelites escape the oncoming Egyptian army, and the Egyptian army is then drowned in the Red Sea, his young daughter asked a question.

“Daddy, why did God kill the Egyptians?  Weren’t they His children, too?”   Wow.  Talk about a perspective I had never contemplated.  And I’m glad I didn’t have to answer that question.  Narrative in the scriptures can be, and usually are pretty one-sided.  Take the Exodus example I’ve been using here.  The scriptural story rolls out in Exodus 1:8-14:

“8 Now there arose up a new king over Egypt, which knew not Joseph.

9 And he said unto his people, Behold, the people of the children of Israel are more and mightier than we:

10 Come on, let us deal wisely with them; lest they multiply, and it come to pass, that, when there falleth out any war, they join also unto our enemies, and fight against us, and so get them up out of the land.

11 Therefore they did set over them taskmasters to afflict them with their burdens. And they built for Pharaoh treasure cities, Pithom and Raamses.

12 But the more they afflicted them, the more they multiplied and grew. And they were grieved because of the children of Israel.

13 And the Egyptians made the children of Israel to serve with rigour:

14 And they made their lives bitter with hard bondage, in mortar, and in brick, and in all manner of service in the field: all their service, wherein they made them serve, was with rigour.”

Typically, we would read this as, “Israel good.  Egypt bad.”  That is how the ancient writer portrayed the political climate and relationship between Egypt’s king and Israel.  In our 21st century perspective, we attach our values to scripture.  In this case, we would say slavery is a deplorable practice and the Egyptians deserved everything coming to them.

And yet anciently, slavery was an accepted way of life and did not hold the negative connotation it holds today.  Debts were paid through slavery.  If a person owed another and could not pay, the debtor could be enslaved for a period of time until the amount of his debt was paid in full.  Then he was freed.  Slavery could be a result of war, where conquered peoples would become slaves until freed.  Think Israel in 387 BCE being trucked off to Babylon only to be freed 50 years later and allowed to return to Jerusalem under Cyrus of Persia.  Slavery was a thing of that day.

Sometimes it’s an interesting exercise to think of a scriptural story from a different perspective.  In our Exodus example, imagine what the Exodus must have looked like from an Egyptian’s point of view.  What would the perspective have been from an Egyptian slave versus a Hebrew slave view point?

Life is never black and white and neither is history.

Which raises another question.  How do we avoid misreading what scripture is trying to teach us?  How do we discover for ourselves the truth that God is trying to convey to us through Holy Writ?  There are thousands of commentaries full of author’s interpretations.  More publications come out every year.  Don’t get me wrong.  Commentaries are great for providing context and historical background.  And yet these same commentaries are subject to the author’s training, belief and prejudices.  How do we know which perspective is what God really wants us to know.

I know of only one way.  It has three steps, but it is really the only manner for each of us to know spiritual truth.

1. Read the scriptures daily.  Just do it.  There’s no short-cut.  Just set aside time daily.

2. Pray.  Pray before reading.  Pray in your heart during your scripture reading.  Ask for God’s help in understanding.  Ask him to reveal to you the truth you need in your life at that time.

3. Ponder.  Think about what you have read.  Think about anything that jumped out at you in your reading.  Pay attention to thoughts that come to you as you think about what you have read.  The Holy Ghost, the testifier of truth, will bring thoughts to your mind and lead you to greater truths.

In John 15:26:  “But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me.”

In 1 John 5:6:  “…And it is the Spirit that beareth witness, because the Spirit is truth.”

In John 16:13: “Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come.”

It seems clear that truth comes from one source and that is from God through the Holy Ghost.  That is how we obtain a holy perspective.  Let’s read with a little more depth.  Let’s take a little more time.  Let’s find the treasures in the word of God.

Be kind.  Make good memories.  Come back soon.



Mysteries abound where most we seek for answers.

Robert Wheadon-126x150

Welcome back!  The title of this post is a quote by Ray Bradbury.  In my last posting, I shared some thoughts on choices and what drives our choices.  I postulated that the deep desires of our heart drive our choices and those desires are the true yard stick of where we are on our way back to God.  We are all found in different places on the yard stick.  And where we are in our becoming like God doesn’t matter.  It is our overall direction we are traveling that matters.  Sometimes we move closer to God, and if you’re anything like me, your movement is one baby step forward and two leaps back.  That’s okay.  That’s how it is supposed to be.  Again, if we are trying to be like God, then wherever we are on the yard stick is fine.  It’s the direction we are trying to travel that is the important component.

Behind this whole yard stick metaphor lies the motivation of our efforts.  What drives us to want to be better people?  Guilt?  Love?  Duty?  Habit? Reward?  I think the answer is “all of the above.”  And all of our choices are not driven by the same motivation.  For example, the choice to eat derives from a biological need.  We don’t eat out of duty or promise of reward, though I certainly, at times, will reward myself with chocolate cake.

Aristotle defined choice as, “a deliberate desire.”  Aristotle’s use of “deliberate” means that our desires are things that we have contemplated and thought deeply on.  We have deliberated on what moves us.  We may not always be deliberate in our choices, but the desire preceding our choices is something we are very familiar with.

Have you noticed how many things God wants us to do are the reverse of our natural inclination?  Jesus teaches if we are asked to walk a mile with someone, instead of saying we are too busy, we are to walk two miles.  If someone steals something, like a coat, instead of throwing the perpetrator in jail, we are to offer that person our cloak, as well.  If someone offends us, we are taught to not only forgive one time, but 70 x 7 times.  (You do the math.)

In Mark 9:36, Jesus taught his apostles about humility and serving with intent.

“And he sat down, and called the twelve, and saith unto them, If any man desire to be first, the same shall be last of all, and servant of all.”

All of these examples show how God’s ways are not our ways.  I think one of the clearest gospel tensions is found in John 14:15.  Jesus teaches:

“If ye love me, keep my commandments.”

We have read and heard that verse our whole lives, but has the message in this short verse struck home?  The verse is saying that obedience is a sign of our love of Jesus Christ.  That concept is largely foreign on several levels to us as we were raised on the principle of individualism, independence and the worth of self through building up the self.

Obedience is bowing our will to another, ceding our wants to the desires of another, and changing our heart to match the heart of another.  My goodness!  That sounds like the soul of Christianity!  Obedience, when fostered with godly love, loses all of its negative colors.

James Kugel, a Jewish biblical scholar, helps reinforce what God is trying to help us to understand.  Prof. Kugel recently wrote how Exodus 32:16 has an interesting interpretative possibility.  In the Talmud, the rabbinic commentary on the Jewish scriptures, it states that the word for carved, harut, should be herut, or freedom.  The verse, which describes Moses bringing the Ten Commandments down from Mt. Sinai, would then read:  “And the tables were the work of God, and the writing was the writing of God, freedom upon the tables.”  This gives the sense that the Ten Commandments were not given as a law of iron, but as a law of freedom.

So, now let’s go back to John 14:15.  “If ye love me, keep my commandments.”  Again, we are back to desires and motivations for our choices in life.  What it seems we should be working on is divine love, demonstrated through obedience of God’s law.  And what is the Savior’s definition of God’s law?  In Mark 12: 30-31, the Savior clearly and lovingly teaches:

“30 And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this is the first commandment.

31 And the second is like, namely this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. There is none other commandment greater than these.”

Thanks for taking a moment to read my thoughts and feelings.  Feel free to provide feedback or questions.  It is all appreciated.

Be kind.  Make good memories.  Come back soon.

 

 

 

 

 



Eenie, Meenie, Miney…

Robert Wheadon-126x150

Decisions, decisions…

Every day we get to make choices.  In fact, we make an average of 35,000 decisions a day.  From whether to get out of bed or not to the choice of what to have for lunch, choices are part of our daily lives.

Choices play a tremendous role in the lives of religious people.  We have a binary relationship with choice, assigning it either a good or bad based on the Ten Commandments.  Many of us then lead our lives held up against the divine checklist and measuring our goodness, self-worth and social standing by our compliance or non-compliance.

I believe in Heavenly Father’s plan for us, choice has always been one of the biggest parts of His plan.  And choice has been with us since our very beginnings.  The story of Adam and Eve totally revolves around choice.  Eat the fruit or not eat the fruit: that is the question.

We are all familiar with the ancient prophet-general Joshua’s statement on choice.  The Israelites were clearing Canaan to inhabit that land.  The people in Canaan were pagan, worshiping a host of deities.  Joshua puts a choice before Israel in Joshua 24:15:

And if it seem evil unto you to serve the Lord, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.”

The choice put before the Israelites was not a new one.  After Moses led Israel out of Egypt, the Lord gave a similar choice to Israel.  In Exodus 20:3, the Lord states:

“Thou shalt have no other gods before me.”

Coming out of Egypt with its polytheistic culture of Ra and Osiris and the host of other deities, Israel was very familiar with the practice of worshiping multiple gods and in having the Creation revolve around stories of these gods.  Polytheism was the cultural and religious norm, not the worship of a single deity.  All of the ancient civilizations were polytheistic.  The world of the Babylonians, Assyrians, Persians, and Egyptians all revolved around polytheism.  And Israel lived among, traded, bartered and fought with all of these peoples.

Monotheism was a bit odd for the time and a sharp delineation between the Israelites and all of their geographical neighbors.  And the theme of God pleading, commanding and reminding Israel to remember Him flows through the scriptural record of Israel’s choices.  In the Old Testament, Israel’s greatest failing is their choice to forget God and worship something or someone else besides God.

If we move forward to the New Testament era, the principle of choice permeates the teachings of the Savior, as well.  What is really interesting here is that the context of choice changes.  While the Old Testament focuses on choosing between idols of stone and wood and the living God, the teachings of Jesus take choice to a deeper level of understanding and application.

For example, in Luke 10 we read of Jesus asking the lawyer what the law says about gaining eternal life.  Instead of listing out the commandments in Exodus 10, the lawyer encapsulates the intent behind the commandments.  He says, “Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself. (Luke 10:27)

And Jesus’ response corroborates the lawyer’s answer.  “Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live.” (Luke 10:28)  There is no surprise in the Savior’s response, as if the lawyer’s response was a new theology or anything.  The lawyer’s response was one already accepted in that time.  And with the lawyer’s response comes a new component in what should motivate our choices: love.

Instead of making choices based on fear that heaven will send bolts of lightning down on us if we err, the teaching is that we are not to be distracted away from God through our love for Him.  We see this in Matthew 6:24: “No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.”

This verse is really a reiteration of Exodus 20, where Israel is told, “You shall have no other gods before me.”  The cultural context has changed from polytheism to individual desire.  But the desires, whether worshiping an idol or taking our focus away from God and putting them on the mammon of materiality, are identical.  And it is here we learn about an aspect of sin and one way in which God views sin.

N.T, Wright, an Anglican biblical scholar at the University of Edinburgh, states it this way. “That’s how sin happens.  It isn’t just that there is a bunch of rules and we ponder, ‘Shall I keep them or not?’  In actuality, [we’ve] been secretly in love with one or more…idols.  [We’ve] been worshiping the creature rather than the creator.” (Lenten Devotional, 2017)

Sin is indeed the failure to do what God has asked us to do.  Yet before the act, before the misstep, before the deed, there is the choice and what desire drives that choice.  And that is what God is after.  He is not after a group of people stuck in a lock-stepped march back to heaven.  He wants our hearts to bend towards Him as he reaches for us.  He does not want us to get distracted with our idols of this age.  Whether it be politics, career, relationships or school, He wants our actions to be driven by choices that are driven by love and desire for Him.

And how do we develop this love for Him and not for the things of our world?  You’ll have to come back next time to read my thoughts on that.

Be kind, make good memories, and come back soon.

 

IMG_0169

 



To Wait or Not To Wait…

Robert Wheadon-126x150

One of the things I lack is vast amounts of patience.  I’m ready to jump on board with any technology that allows me to access data faster or research information.  I want things now.  I don’t want to wait too long for my book to come from Amazon, or wait in line at McDonald’s for my Big Mac.  It’s supposed to be fast food, right?

Obviously, I need some improvement.  By learning patience, I will save myself from getting all bound up in feelings of frustration, annoyance and outright anger. And I might master my soul…

In Luke, the Savior said:

19 In your patience possess ye your souls. (Luke 21:19)

In New Testament Greek, the word “possess” also has connotations of control over or mastery, as well as acquire or win.  If you drop one of those related terms in place of “possess” you gain a clearer vision of the verse and the Savior’s message here.

As a parent, I get to deal with patience quite a bit.  As a parent, patience becomes the antidote I preach to my children when they want something in the moment.  Like me, sometimes they just want something now.  And children become very adept at vocalizing their immediate want very early in life.  In response, I’ve become very adept at telling them, “Be patient.”  I’m not really teaching them patience when I say that.  I’m teaching them the universal parental signal to be quiet and quit bugging me.

However…..

Real patience contains ingredients of humility and faith.  As children of God, how many times have we sent our wants heavenward in prayer?  Have we prayed over children, spouses, family, jobs, or direction in life?  Of course we have.  Have our prayers been immediately answered how we desire?  Of course not.  When the heavens seem silent and answers are far away, it is very hard to hear the words, “Be patient.”  It takes large dollops of faith and humility to place ourselves in God’s care and say, “Thy will be done,” rather than rage when our mortal will is not accommodated.  And yet this is one of mortality’s lessons.

It helps me realize the importance of patience when I think of the perfect patience Heavenly Father has with His children.  We stumble and fall like so many toddlers learning to walk in this life.  And still, He is always patient, always there, encouraging us to keep trying, keep reaching for His light and keep walking that narrow path back to Him.

Our amount of patience can also be a means of measurement of our amount of charity.  Just before the Savior presents the parable of the Good Samaritan, Jesus responds to a lawyer.  The lawyer asks the conditions to gain eternal life.  The Savior responds with a question:  What does the scriptures say?  The lawyer astutely answers from the law of Moses – Love God and love your neighbor.

“25 And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?

26 He said unto him, What is written in the law? how readest thou?

27 And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself.

28 And he said unto him, Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live.” (Luke 10:25-28)

I think the practice of patience with those in our lives helps us obey that commandment in a much richer and Christ-like manner.  If I am patient, I am not busy passing judgement.  If I am patient, I am less concerned about my own personal agenda and more about the needs of others.  If I am patient, I will try and see life with the view of others rather than my own myopic vision.

Joseph Smith wrote: “Ye are not able to abide the presence of God now, neither the ministering of angels; wherefore, continue in patience until ye are perfected.” (D&C 67:13)

The practicing of patience is a divine attribute of our Heavenly Father.  We should practice patience, as well.  We are trying to become like God, one small, stumbling step at a time.  Let’s be patient with ourselves, our fellow travelers in life, and faithfully patient that all is in God’s hands and He is guiding us home.

IMG_0061

   Be kind, make good memories, and come back soon.